KDI FOCUS Household Debt Vulnerability and Directions for Risk Management 2015.05.07

Series No. No. 41, eng.
KDI FOCUS
Household Debt Vulnerability and Directions for Risk Management
#거시건전성 정책
2015.05.07
- 영문요약
-
□ Korea’s households and banks seem relatively sound in terms of their loss-absorbing capacities. However, a number of worrying signs are present. Some of the negative indicators are the rising share of non-bank consumer loans; the large share of real estate out of household assets, borrowing in the form of short-term balloon payment loans, and the credit risk of low-income indebted households. Against this backdrop, a sound and effective risk management system needs to be designed based on a proper assessment of the current situation while differentiating normal from emergency measures and ex ante from ex post measures.
- The recent debate over household debt has included some mixed discussions in terms of risks to financial and social stability, micro-level conditions, and macro-level effects.
- The credit risk of households with loans from (systemically important) banks appears limited, while the risk of households with non-bank borrowings is relatively high.
- The majority of debt can be found in households whose repayment ability is relatively strong in terms of the level of income and (net) asset.
- The characteristics of asset and liability composition of household balance sheets have raised concerns about a liquidity mismatch between assets and liabilities and the risk of debt deflation.
- The large increase in household credit activity has led to a rise in the number of people in default, suggesting a need for a firm establishment of lending practices of financial institutions based on repayment abilities and an improvement in consumer debt-relief programs.
- Major tasks that lie ahead include a moderate degree of debt-deleveraging and mitigation of its downward pressure, stabilizing the loan structure, reconfiguring the consumer debt-relief programs, redefining the role of credit policies from the areas of social safety net, and improving labor market conditions and household income.
- Suitable responses should be chosen and implemented for different situations based on objective assessment and understanding on the given situations.
- Approaches for risk management should be designed in a way that differentiates between normal and emergency measures and between ex ante and ex post measures.
- Attention should be paid to the vulnerability of low-income borrowers though their credit risk may not pose systemic risks to the economy.
- 목차
-
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Understanding the Risks of Household Indebtedness
Ⅲ. Major Future Tasks and Ideas for the Design of Risk Management System
Ⅳ. Summary and Major Implications
더 자세히 알고 싶으면?
관련 자료 ( 9 )
- 주요 관련자료
- 같은 주제자료

한국개발연구원의 본 저작물은 “공공누리 제3유형 : 출처표시 + 변경금지” 조건에 따라 이용할 수 있습니다. 저작권정책 참조
- 담당자
- 윤정애 전문연구원yoon0511@kdi.re.kr 044-550-4450
보안문자 확인
무단등록 및 수집 방지를 위해 아래 보안문자를 입력해 주세요.
KDI 직원 정보 확인
등록완료
소중한 의견 감사드립니다.
등록실패
잠시 후 다시 시도해주세요.