본문

KDI연구

KDI연구원들이 각 분야의 전문보고서를 제공합니다.

법경제

Working Paper

Social Capital and Policy in Korea

페이스북
커버이미지
  • 저자 우천식(禹天植) , 김태종, 장원호
  • 발행일 2007/08/30
  • 시리즈 번호 2007-01
원문보기
요약 This paper aims to examine the state of social capital in Korea and to explore the possibilities for development of policy to nurture social capital in the country. Social capital refers to intangible assets in the form of norms, institutions, networks, and trust that facilitate cooperation and help overcome social dilemmas.

Korea is faced with multi-faceted challenges including a decline in the potential growth rate, aggravated income inequality, and a fast aging society. Yet policy reorientation and institutional reform are beset with difficulties that arise from fragmentation of the society and deeply-held distrust of public authority. These difficulties in turn reflect Korea’s development trajectory during the twentieth century: colonial rule by the Japanese, a devastating civil war, government-led economic development, and democratization process that is still young.

Western literature on social capital tends to emphasize the role of civic participation in the accumulation of social capital. This tendency presumes that civic associations are open and diverse in membership and internal discourse democratic, and that these characteristics will ensure participation to lead to greater social trust. It is doubtful whether dominant forms of Korea’s civil society associations, mostly based on school and regional ties can fulfill a similar facilitating role. We argue in this paper that the differences in the trajectory of social development in Korea are likely to require a different policy approach in enhancing social capital, and that the government needs to develop policies under the following principles.

First, the government effort should be focused first and foremost on governance reform. Impartial judiciary, corruption-free government, consistent and succinct law that commands public respect, accountability in policy formation and implementation, and participatory and deliberative policy process are the essential elements in this regard.

Second, government intervention to promote participation in civic associations should take a cautious, “gardening”-style approach. The government should abstain from picking the winners among various civic organizations. What types of civic organizations should be promoted is best determined through the initiative of the civil society itself (for instance through community foundations) or individual taxpayers (for instance through the percent law).

Third, research efforts to study viable policy options should be vigorously supported. The cumulative body of policy research is still shallow across the world. Furthermore, development of social capital takes place within the historical and cultural contexts of a society. While we can learn from the literature overseas, eventually domestic policy initiatives should be informed by domestic policy research, especially in the area of social capital.
같은 주제 자료 이 내용과 같은 주제를 다루고 있는 자료입니다.

가입하신 이동통신사의 요금제에 따라
데이터 요금이 과다하게 부가될 수 있습니다.

파일을 다운로드하시겠습니까?
KDI 연구 카테고리
상세검색